The Truth About Penetration Testing - It’s Not Just Hacking
2 min read

2 min read
When people hear “penetration testing,” they often picture someone in a hoodie, sitting in a dark room, typing away in a terminal filled with green text. Hacking is exciting and fun, but what’s often overlooked is the importance of communication and report writing. These are the skills that truly define a successful penetration tester.
When I first started in cybersecurity, I was told penetration testing was all about breaking things and moving on. That’s partially true — but it’s only half the story.
In reality, penetration testing involves much more than just exploiting vulnerabilities. It requires choosing a niche, understanding systems deeply, identifying weaknesses, and communicating your findings. And speaking of niches, the variety within pentesting is vast. Here are just a few examples:
This list could go on. But before diving into any of these areas, you need a strong foundation — networking, Linux, protocols, and methodology. That’s when the real work begins.
Behind every solid penetration test is a professional who has developed a methodology and knows how to communicate risk. It begins with identifying a niche where you excel, learning how to test thoroughly, and documenting your findings with clarity.
Pentesters don’t just hack — they spend a significant amount of time on client calls, scoping engagements, understanding environments, and learning what matters most to the client. These conversations help define what’s in scope, what the client is concerned about, and how you can deliver the most value through your testing.
During an engagement, note-taking is essential. You’ll need to keep track of each step and each discovery. After exploitation, it’s just as important to understand how to remediate the issue, because that’s what your client ultimately cares about.
One of the biggest misconceptions about penetration testing is that the exploit is the deliverable. It’s not — the report is.
Clients pay for a professional, detailed report that outlines:
Each finding should be assessed for its real-world impact. Too often, testers assign the same severity to the same type of vulnerability without considering context. For example, a Stored XSS may seem Medium severity, but if you can chain the attack with session riding or cookie stealing, its impact could be much higher.
You need to think critically:
Failing to justify severity properly can lead to confusion for the client and discussions in report walkthrough calls. If a client disagrees, you could know how to defend your assessment with reasoning and evidence. If you can’t, your severity probably is inaccurate and needs to be reevaluated.
If you want to stand out as a penetration tester, your ability to communicate clearly and write professional reports matters just as much as your technical skills. The hack might get you in, but it’s the report that delivers value.
You could be the most skilled hacker in the world, but without documentation and a clear explanation of the business impact, your work won’t help the client fix the problem. Ultimately, helping clients fix vulnerabilities — not just find them — is the real goal.
Lead Technical Writer
Evan is a dedicated cybersecurity professional with a degree from Roger Williams University. He is certified in GRTP, OSCP, eWPTX, eCPPT, and eJPT. He specializes in web application and API security. In his free time, he identifies vulnerabilities in FOSS applications and mentors aspiring cybersecurity professionals.
Learn how to find, report, and publish CVEs using open-source apps. Build skills, earn credibility, and start your penetration testing journey the right way.
May 7, 2025
A beginner-friendly guide to learning API security with free courses, hands-on tools, and certifications from APISEC University.
Apr 23, 2025
A complete beginner’s guide to passing the eJPT certification—how to study, what to practice, and why it’s the perfect starting point for ethical hacking.
Apr 16, 2025